Promoting Student Engagement through Skill-Heterogeneous Peer Tutoring

Wolfgang Odendahl

Abstract


This article is concerned with the effects of a specialized setup for student group work in L3 teaching. It promotes grouping students according to their skills in various subjects into heterogeneous groups as a way for inducing peer tutoring and raising student’s self-esteem. The motivation for this study sprang from an extra-curricular study project for subtitling German short films intended as a remedy for the widely observable study fatigue in Taiwanese German as a Foreign Language (GFL) majors. It turned out that combining students into workgroups couldn’t just rely on personal preferences, because the work required skillsets from three distinct areas: Project Management, Language, and Technology. As a solution to this kind of settings, this article proposes the instructor-organized creation of skill-heterogeneous workgroups. As theoretical background, it relies on findings from the fields of cooperative group work (e.g. Slavin, 2014; Cohen & Lotan, 2014, et al.), ability grouping and skill grouping (e.g. Missett, Brunner, Callahan, Moon, & Azano, 2014; Kulik & Kulik, 1992, et al.) in combination with motivational theories (e.g. Csikszentmihalyi, 1990; Dörnyei, 2008; Reeve, 2009, et al.). The results of this project seem to indicate that the best way of grouping students was to assign each group an expert from one of the three main fields involved in subtitling. This way, every group member has authority in one field and can accept tutoring in the two remaining fields without losing face. The participating students enjoyed highly efficient group work that produced lasting synergetic effects in all areas involved.

Keywords: Group Work, Peer Tutoring, Student Engagement, Cooperative Learning, Placement

http://interface.ntu.edu.tw/


Keywords


Group Work, Peer Tutoring, Student Engagement, Cooperative Learning, Placement

Full Text:

HTML PDF

References


Annis, L. F. (1983): "The Processes and Effects of Peer Tutoring" Human Learning: Journal of Practical Research & Applications 2, 1,

–47.

ARD Das Erste (2014, Februar 25): "Gestaltung von Untertiteln".

Bernhardt, P. E. (2014): "Making Decisions about Academic Trajectories: A Qualitative Study of Teachers’ Course Recommendation Practices" American Secondary Education 42, 2, 33–50.

Bosley, D. (1989): A National Study of the Uses of Collaborative Writing in Business Communications Courses among Members of the ABC. Illinois State U.

Bruffee, K. A. (1972): "The Way Out: A Critical Survey of Innovations in College Teaching, with Special Reference to the December, 1971, Issue of College

English" College English 33, 4, 457–470.

Brulles, D., Saunders, R., & Cohn, S. J. (2010): "Improving Performance for Gifted Students in a Cluster Grouping Model" Journal for the Education of the Gifted 34, 2, 327–350.

Büttner, G., Warwas, J., & Adl-Amini, K. (2012): "Kooperatives Lernen und Peer Tutoring im inklusiven Unterricht" Zeitschrift für Inklusion 1, 2.

Chen, Y.-H. (2005): Deutsch als Tertiärsprache in Taiwan. Unter besonderer Berücksichtigung des Chinesischen als L1 und des Englischen als erster

Fremdsprache (Ph. D. Dissertation). Hamburg, Hamburg.

Clément, R., Dörnyei, Z., & Noels, K. A. (1994): "Motivation, Self‐confidence, and Group Cohesion in the Foreign Language Classroom" Language Learning 44, 3, 417–448.

Cohen, E. G. & Lotan, R. A. (2014): Designing Groupwork: Strategies for the Heterogeneous Classroom. New York: Teachers College Press, Kindle

Edition.

Colvin, J. (2007): Peer Tutoring in Higher Education: The Social Dynamics of a Classroom. Saarbrücken: VDM.

Connell, J. P. & Wellborn, J. G. (1991): "Competence, Autonomy, and Relatedness: A Motivational Analysis of Self-System Processes" In: M. R. Gunnar

& L. A. Sroufe (Hrsg.), Self Processes and Development. Hillsdale, NJ, England: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 43–77.

Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990): Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience. New York: Harper & Row.

Deci, E. L. & Ryan, R. M. (1985): Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior. New York: Plenum.

Durling, R. & Schick, C. (1976): "Concept Attainment by Pairs and Individuals as a Function of Vocalization" Journal of Educational Psychology

, 1, 83–91.

Ede, L. S. & Lunsford, A. A. (1990): Singular Texts/Plural Authors: Perspectives on Collaborative Writing. Carbondale: Southern Illinois

University Press.

Fleishman, E. A. (1964): The Structure and Measurement of Physical Fitness. Oxford: Prentice-Hall.

Goodlad, S. & Hirst, B. (1989): Peer Tutoring. A Guide to Learning by Teaching. : ERIC.

Graham, C. R. & Misanchuk, M. (2004): "Computer-Mediated Learning Groups: Benefits and Challenges to Using Groupwork in Online Learning Environments"

In: Online Collaborative Learning: Theory and Practice. Hershey: IGI Global, Bd. 1, 1–202.

Hatano, G. (1993): "Time to Merge Vygotskian and Constructivist Conceptions of Knowledge Acquisitions" In: E. A. Forman, N. Minick, & C. A. Stone

(Hrsg.), Contexts for Learning: Sociocultural Dynamics in Children’s Development. New York: Oxford University Press, 153–166.

Hoffer, T. B. (1992): "Middle School Ability Grouping and Student Achievement in Science and Mathematics" Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 14, 3, 205–227.

Johnson, D. W. & Johnson, R. T. (1989): Cooperation and Competition: Theory and Research. Edina: Interaction.

Johnson, D. W. & Johnson, R. T. (1999): Learning Together and Alone: Cooperative, Competitive, and Individualistic Learning. Needham Heights,

MA: Allyn and Bacon, 5. Aufl.

Kulik, J. A. (1992): An Analysis of the Research on Ability Grouping: Historical and Contemporary Perspectives. Storrs, CT: National Research Center on the

Gifted and Talented.

Kulik, J. A. & Kulik, C.-L. C. (1992): "Meta-analytic Findings on Grouping Programs" Gifted Child Quarterly 36, 2, 73–77.

Liu, H. (2014): "Questioning the Stability of Learner Anxiety in the Ability-Grouped Foreign Language Classroom" The Asian EFL Journal Quarterly

Lohmann, H. (1996): Die deutschen Abteilungen an den Universitäten in Taiwan und ihre Studenten: zur Lage des Deutschunterrichts an den

Universtäten und ausseruniversitären Institutionen in Taiwan im Kontext des chinesischen Bildungssystems und zur Studien- und Lebenssituation der

Studenten an den deutschen Abteilungen. Münster; New York: Waxmann.

Lotan, R. A. (2003): "Group-Worthy Tasks" Educational Leadership 60, 6, 72.

Mälzer-Semlinger, N. (2011): "Bild-Text-Beziehungen beim Filmübersetzen" Lebende Sprachen 56, 2, 214–223.

Merkelbach, C. (2011): "Wie unterscheiden sich die Lernstrategien beim Erlernen von L2 und L3? Ergebnisse einer empirischen Studie bei taiwanischen

Deutsch-als-L3-Lernenden" Zeitschrift für Interkulturellen Fremdsprachenunterricht 16, 2, 126–146.

Missett, T. C., Brunner, M. M., Callahan, C. M., Moon, T. R., & Azano, A. P. (2014): "Exploring Teacher Beliefs and Use of Acceleration, Ability

Grouping, and Formative Assessment" Journal for the Education of the Gifted 37, 3, 245–268.

Neihart, M. (2007): "The Socioaffective Impact of Acceleration and Ability Grouping: Recommendations for Best Practice" Gifted Child Quarterly 51,

, 330–341.

Odendahl, W. (2015): "CLlL-Projekt zur chinesischen Untertitelung deutscher Kurzfilme als Mittel zur Motivationsförderung" In: C. Merkelbach (Hrsg.), Mehr Sprache(n) lernen - mehr Sprache(n) lehren. Aachen: Shaker, 117–142.

Piaget, J. (1923): Le langage et la pensée chez l’enfant. Études sur la logique de l’enfant. Neuchâtel, Paris:

Delachaux and Niestlé, 3; 1948 Aufl.

Plank, J. (1992): "Deutschstudium in Taiwan" Taiwan Heute (= Freies China 11.12, S. 23-30) 6, 5.

Reeve, J. (2009): Understanding Motivation and Emotion. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, 5. Aufl.

Reiß, K. (1984): "Adäquatheit und Äquivalenz" In: Die Theorie des Übersetzens und ihr Aufschlußwert für die

Übersetzungs-und Dolmetschdidaktik. Akten des Internationalen Kolloquiums der Association Internationale de Linguistique Appliquée AILA,

Saarbrücken. Tübingen: Narr, 161–176.

Ryan, R. M. & Deci, E. L. (2000): "Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivations: Classic Definitions and New Directions" Contemporary Educational Psychology 25, 1, 54–67.

Slavin, R. E. (1980): "Cooperative Learning" Review of Educational Research 50, 2, 315–342.

Smit, D. W. (1994): "Some Difficulties with Collaborative Learning" In: G. A. Olson & S. I. Dobrin (Hrsg.), Composition Theory for the Postmodern Classroom. New York: SUNY, 69–81.

Stoller, F. L. & Grabe, W. (1997): "Content-Based Instruction: Research Foundations" In: S. B. Stryker & B. L. Leaver (Hrsg.), Content-based Instruction in Foreign Language Education: Models and Methods. Washington, D.C: Georgetown University Press, 5–21.

Topping, K. J. (1996): "The Effectiveness of Peer Tutoring in Further and Higher Education: A Typology and Review of the Literature" Higher Education 32, 3, 321–345.

Vygotskiĭ, L. S. (1978): Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes (M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E.

Souberman, Hrsg.). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Webb, N. M. (2008): "Learning in Small Groups" In: T. L. Good (Hrsg.), 21st Century Education: A Reference Handbook. New York: SAGE Publications,

–211.

White, R. W. (1959): "Motivation Reconsidered: The Concept of Competence" Psychological Review 66, 5, 297–333.

Wunsch, C. (2009): "Binnendifferenzierung" In: U. O. H. Jung (Hrsg.), Praktische Handreichung für Fremdsprachenlehrer. Frankfurt / M.: Lang,

Aufl., 41–47.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.6667/interface.1.2016.26

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2016 Wolfgang Odendahl

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 

Copyright © 2016. All Rights Reserved | Interface | ISSN: 2519-1268