Spectral Etiologies in “Enmerkar and the Lord of Aratta.”

Claudio Sansone

Abstract


This article examines the invention of writing as represented in the Sumerian epic “Enmerkar and the Lord of Aratta.” I argue that a close analysis of the techniques of literary figuration in this episode reveals a kind of circular “spectrality” or “hauntedness” in the poem: the invention of writing seems to be described as if writing had already been invented. This has consequences for both how we understand the poem, as well as more limited consequences concerning the modes of realism and the construction of similes in Sumerian poetry. After analyzing the relevant key passages, I expand my analysis by observing that the poem is more broadly haunted by predetermined, spectral outcomes. For instance, Uruk is already seen to have achieved the acme of its greatness before it is made glorious by Enmerkar; the export of writing as a technology precedes the inventions of exports. In moving toward a conclusion, I connect all these spectral etiologies to the broader problem of historical “progress models” that Sumerian literary works employ to rewrite history to suit specific, presentist political contexts and to propose determined futures for civilization. We will see that the specific contribution of “Enmerkar and the Lord of Aratta” to this broader discourse is that it embeds the invention of writing within these progress models, which were previously more centered on the perceived shifts from nomadism to agriculturalism and finally to city life.


Keywords


Invention of Writing, Mesopotamian Literature, Sumerian Poetry, Progress Models

Full Text:

PDF

References


Asher-Greve, Julia M. and Westenholz, Joan Goodnick. (2013). Goddesses in Context: On Divine Powers, Roles, Relationships and Gender in Mesopotamian Textual and Visual Sources. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck Ruprecht.

Derrida, Jacques. (2004). Specters of Marx: The State of Debt, the Work of Mourning and the New International. London: Routledge.

Glassner, Jean-Jacques. (2003). The Invention of Cuneiform: Writing in Sumer. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins UP.

Komoróczy, Géza. (1975). Zur Ätiologie der Schrifterfindung im Enmerkar-Epos. Altorientalische Forschungen, 3, 19-24.

Kramer, S. N. (1977). Commerce and Trade: Gleanings from Sumerian Literature. Iraq, 39(1), 59-66.

–. (1968). The ‘Babel of Tongue’': A Sumerian Version. Journal of the American Oriental Society, 88(1), 108-111.

–. (1952). Enmerkar and the Lord of Aratta: A Sumerian Epic Tale of Iraq and Iran. Philadelphia: The University Museum, University of Pennsylvania.

Lamberg-Karlovsky, C. C. (1982). Dilmun: Gateway to Immortality. Journal of Near Eastern Studies, 41(1), 45-50.

Michalowski, Piotr. (1998). Nisaba. A. Reallexikon der Assyriologie und vorderasiatischen Archäologie 9, 575-579.

Postgate, Nicholas. (1992). Early Mesopotamian Society and Economy at the Dawn of History. London: Routledge.

Ramsey, Shawn. (2020). From Sunlight to Shadow and Back Again: Enmerkar and the Lord of Aratta and the Function of Analogical Reasoning in Mesopotamian Rhetoric. Rhetoric Society Quarterly, 51(1), 42–54.

Sansone, Claudio. (2025). Cities Writ in Water: Urbanization, Flood, and Power in Sumerian Poetry. Ex-Position 54, (forthcoming).

Saussy, Haun. (2016). The Ethnography of Rhythm: Orality and Its Technologies. NY Fordham UP.

Vanstiphout, H. L. J. (2004). Epics of Sumerian Kings: The Matter of Aratta. Leiden: Brill.

–. (1994). Another Attempt at the Spell of Nudimmud. Revue d'assyriologie et d'archéologie orientale, 88, 135-154.

–. (1989). Enmerkar’s Invention of Writing Revisited. In H. Behrens, D. Loding, and M. T .Roth (Eds.), DUMU-E2- DUB-BA-A: Studies in Honor of Åke W. Sjöberg (pp. 515-524). Philadelphia: Occasional Publications of the Samuel Noah Kramer Fund.

Yushu, Gong. (2010). The Sumerian Account of the Invention of Writing—A New Interpretation. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2, 7446–7453.

Zaccagnini, Carlo. (1993). Ideological and Procedural Paradigms in Ancient Near Eastern Long Distance Exchanges: The Case of Enmerkar and the Lord of Aratta. Altorientalische Forschungen, 20(1), 34-42.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.6667/interface.26.2025.253

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2025 Claudio Sansone

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 

Copyright © 2016. All Rights Reserved | Interface | ISSN: 2519-1268