Plato and art: Controversies, political engagement and education

Hippokratis Kiaris

Abstract


Plato’s views on art are rather controversial and provocative. On the one hand he maintains a suspicion for artists, reaching the point to claim that they should be expelled from the ideal city that he envisages and describes in his Republic. On the opposite side he considers artistic training, in music and poetry in particular but not in painting, as an essential component of the good education, again in the Republic, elevating art’s role in the society. Various attempts have been made by Platonic scholars to interpret and consolidate these seemingly contrasting notions, by focusing on Plato’s usage of myths, in his literary style that involves dialogues, and other elements. Here I suggest an additional point that is based on the premise that Plato differentiates arts depending on their substance, viewing painting, poetry, and music with progressively decreasing hostility. He also targets primarily the artist and his social role but dissociates the artistic creation, which becomes the property of the city. As such, art can and should be censored, and it should be politically charged and engaged, for the collective benefit. 


References


Adorno, Theodor W. (2003) The Philosophy of Modern Music. Translated into English by Anne G. Mitchell and Wesley V. Blomster. Continuum International Publishing Group, pp. 41–42.

Blondell R. The Play of Character in Plato’s Dialogues. Cambridge University Press; 2002.

Büttner, S. (2011). "6. Inspiration and Inspired Poets in Plato’s Dialogues". In Plato and the Poets. Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/ej.9789004201293.i-434.23

Capuccino, C. (2011). "4. Plato’s Ion And The Ethics Of Praise". In Plato and the Poets. Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/ej.9789004201293.i-434.15

Collobert, C. (2011). "3. Poetry As Flawed Reproduction: Possession And Mimesis". In Plato and the Poets. Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/ej.9789004201293.i-434.10

Destrée, P., & Herrmann, F. (Eds.). (21 Mar. 2011). Plato and the Poets. Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/ej.9789004201293.i-434

Dorter K. The Ion: Plato's Characterization of Art. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism

Glucker, J. Plato’s Ion: Difficulties and Contradictions. Philosophia 47, 943–958 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11406-018-0029-z

Hall, Robert W. “Plato’s Theory of Art: A Reassessment.” The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, vol. 33, no. 1, 1974, pp. 75–82. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/428949.

Halliwell, Stephen. The Aesthetics of Mimesis: Ancient Texts and Modern Problems. Princeton University Press, 2002. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt7rn67

Henderson, W. J. “Criteria in the Greek Lyric Contests.” Mnemosyne, vol. 42, no. 1/2, 1989, pp. 24–40. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/4431776.

Hunter, Richard. "Plato’s Ion and the Origins of Scholarship". Ancient Scholarship and Grammar: Archetypes, Concepts and Contexts, edited by Stephanos Matthaios, Franco

Jansen S. Audience Psychology and Censorship in Plato’s Republic: The Problem of the Irrational Part. 2015. Epoché, Volume 19, Issue 2 (Spring 2015). 1–181 DOI: 10.5840/epoche2014121728

KEUM, TAE-YEOUN. Plato and the Mythic Tradition in Political Thought. Harvard University Press, 2020. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv18kc13m

Kiaris H. The Chinese room argument in Plato’s Ion. Interface: Journal of European Languages and Literatures. Issue 21 (2023a), pp. 59-68. DOI: 10.6667/interface.21.2023.201.

Kiaris H. The End of the Western Civilization? The Intellectual Journey of Humanity to Adulthood. 118 p. Vernon Press, Delaware USA. 2023b.

Ladrilre C, The Problem of Plato’S Ion, The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, Volume 10, Issue 1, September 1951, Pages 26–34, https://doi.org/10.2307/426785

Landry, A. (2015). Inspiration and Technē : Divination in Plato’s Ion. PLATO JOURNAL, 14, 85-97. https://doi.org/10.14195/2183-4105_14_6

Nightingale AW. Genres in Dialogue: Plato and the Construct of Philosophy. Cambridge University Press; 1995.

Papadopoulou T (ed.), Of Cornelius Castoriadis: We are Responsible for our History, Athens: Polis, 2000.

Pappas, N. (1989). Plato's Ion: The Problem of the Author. Philosophy, 64(249), 381-389. doi:10.1017/S0031819100044727.

Partee, Morriss Henry. “Plato’s Banishment of Poetry.” The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, vol. 29, no. 2, 1970, pp. 209–22. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/428602

Partenie, Catalin (ed.) (2009). Plato’s Myths. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Popper, Karl R. The Open Society and Its Enemies. Princeton, N.J., Princeton University Press, 1963.

Price, A. W., ‘Plato on Eudaimonia’, Virtue and Reason in Plato and Aristotle (Oxford, 2011; online edn, Oxford Academic, 19 Jan. 2012), https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199609611.003.0002,

Reitz, Charles (2000). Art, Alienation, and the Humanities: A Critical Engagement with Herbert Marcuse. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

Searle, J., 1980, ‘Minds, Brains and Programs’, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3: 417–57

Vol. 32, No. 1 (Autumn, 1973), pp. 65-78 (14 pages)

Surber, J. O. (2019). "Chapter 6 Hegel’s Plato: A New Departure". In Brill’s Companion to German Platonism. Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004285163_007

Svoboda, Toby (2021). Plato’s Ion as an Ethical Performance. In Garry Hagberg (ed.), Fictional Worlds and the Moral Imagination. pp. 3-18.

Tarrant, Dorothy. “Style and Thought in Plato’s Dialogues.” The Classical Quarterly, vol. 42, no. 1/2, 1948, pp. 28–34. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/636708.

Tassis T. (2011). Human creation, imagination and autonomy. A brief introduction to Castoriadis' social and psychoanalytical philosophy. Philosophica, 37, Lisboa, 2011, pp. 197-213.

Whitehead Alfred North, Process and Reality, p. 39 [Free Press, 1979]




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.6667/interface.25.2024.228

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2025 Hippokratis Kiaris

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 

Copyright © 2016. All Rights Reserved | Interface | ISSN: 2519-1268